Election Survey

LVIP Survey in the goal of providing innovative solutions to the data collection needs of businesses and organizations. With a passion for customer satisfaction, LVIP created a company that is client-focused from beginning to end.

Headquartered in Center jakarta, LVIP Survey of the art facility was designed to meet the most rigid security standards. We are proud of our services and team who are each dedicated to carrying out our promise to provide complete customer satisfaction.


The National Election Pool’s exclusive provider of election exit poll data

We are the exclusive provider of election exit polls to the National Election Pool consisting of Media Network and the Associated Press and we are currently preparing for our coverage of the 2019 Indonesia Elections. Midterm wewill be conducting a national survey in all 34 provinces as well as statewide surveys in key battleground states.

Our voter surveys will provide political, demographic and geographic information detailing voter preferences for Indonesia's Parliament and Governor races.

Exit Polls tell us:

WHO voted for each candidate
WHY voters in your area made critical choices
WHERE geographical differences on candidates and issues were a factor.

We currently conducts all exit polls and provides election projections and analysis for the news organizations that comprise the National Election Pool Media and the Associated Press. We will again be the exclusive providers of exit polling data for the 2015 to 2020 National Elections.

Exit poll data is one of the key methods of understanding the results of an election and Edison Research is proud to be the exclusive provider of this important information to news organizations around the country and around the world.


A quick count is the process of collecting information gathered by hundreds, or thousands, of volunteers. All information, or data, comes from the direct observation of the election process. Observers watch the electoral authorities as they administer the voting process and count the ballots. They record information, including the actual vote count, on standardized forms and communicate their findings to a central collection point.

A quick count IS NOT the same as political opinion research, or exit polling. Quick counts do not rely on asking voters, or anyone else, how they might vote or require that voters divulge how they did vote. No opinions are expressed and none are requested from anyone.

Groups that try to collect data from every polling station attempt a comprehensive quick count. Comprehensive counts are designed to mirror the official vote count. Alternatively, and more commonly, groups collect information from a scientific random selection of polling stations to derive a reliable projection of results.1 Such quick counts require fewer volunteers, although even groups that conduct quick counts using a random sample of polling stations often place observers in many more polling stations than those included in the quick count's random sample. This engenders wider accountability, provides a greater deterrent against manipulation and enhances citizen participation in the election process.

Most quick counts now have two components: 
1) an independent check on the official vote totals and 
2) a systematic analysis of the qualitative aspects of an electoral process.

Quick counts are used to monitor the vote as a reasonably straightforward arithmetic exercise. Was the counting process proper or manipulated? Were the votes added correctly from the precinct to the national (or district) total? Were voter preferences reflected in the results announced by electoral or other governmental authorities? These questions can be answered at the most basic level—by analyzing quick count polling station observations and comparing the recorded vote count with official polling station results, or by comparing quick count national figures against official national results.

In many instances there is no other independent assessment of the official vote count. In a political environment in which large segments of society lack trust in the electoral process, the quick count can promote confidence in official results. The same volunteer and communications network used to report information on the vote count is also used to collect information on the qualitative aspects of an electoral process. Qualitative questions that commonly appear on observer forms include, for example:

• When did the polling station open? (Observers circle the correct answer; e.g., between 6:00 and 7:00a.m., between 7:00 and 8:00a.m., between 8:00 and 9:00a.m., or after 9:00a.m.)
 • Were required electoral materials provided? (Observers check off materials provided, which may include the voter list, ballots, indelible ink, ballot boxes, voting booths and tally sheets.) 
• When did voting begin? (Observers circle the correct answer; e.g., between 7:00 and 8:00a.m., between 8:00 and 9:00a.m., between 9:00 and 10:00a.m., or after 10:00a.m.) 
• Were any irregularities observed during the voting process? (The form provides a list of potential problems to be checked off that address issues such as disenfranchisement of qualified voters, illegal voting, ballot box stuffing and compromises in ballot secrecy.) 
• Which political parties had representatives inside the polling station? (The parties are listed on the form; observers check off those present.) 
• Did party pollwatchers challenge the results at the polling station? (The form may provide a list of legal reasons for complaints to be checked off.) 
• Were the tally sheets completed accurately?

Groups can use this information to investigate and report on occurrences at specific polling stations. However, these data are most potent in their aggregate form; this can allow groups to comment on the quality of the process as a whole, and to identify precisely irregularities that could have affected the election's outcome.


A successful quick count begins with a clear understanding and statement of the project's goals. Quick count leaders should identify their goals to facilitate both a strategic approach and a tactical plan. Potential goals include:

• deterring fraud; 
• detecting fraud; 
• offering a timely forecast of the results; 
• instilling confidence in the electoral process and official results; 
• reporting on the quality of the process 
• encouraging citizen participation; 
• extending organizational reach and skills building; and 
• setting the stage for future activities


Before a group commits to undertaking a quick count, it must determine whether one is feasible. In some cases, even if feasible, the requirements for a successful quick count are absent. Three basic conditions must be met: 

• observers must have access to polling stations and to counting centers; 
• the group must be credible (i.e., it has to be trusted by most key audiences on election day); and 
• the project needs to be supported by adequate resources.

Access to data Quick counts are based on actual observation of events. At the very least, observers must have free access to the voting and counting processes. Free access throughout the day from opening until close of the polls is indispensable if the observer group is to evaluate qualitative aspects of the process. Ideally, quick count groups should solicit and receive a document from election authorities guaranteeing observers free access to the polling station and the counting process at all levels.

Credibility with Audiences A civic group planning a quick count must be prepared to cultivate credibility with audiences it deems crucial to accomplishing its particular goals. For example, if the main goal is to deter fraud, electoral authorities and political parties are key audiences. If the goal is to instill public confidence in the process, it is important to build credibility with the general electorate.

Two main components of credibility are competence and independence. To promote an image of competence, groups themselves have to behave in a transparent manner. They should make public items such as charters, bylaws and financial statements. They should publicize their plans and methods, which should be sensible and feasible. Key audiences must also see a quick count sponsor as independent. To ensure this, groups may require that every individual leader, staff member and volunteer have no partisan political involvement. If this is not possible, the alternative is to create an organization that is politically representative and balanced.
Adequate Resources Significant human, technical and financial resources are required to conduct a quick count. Groups must tap into, or create, a nationwide network of volunteers; they must develop a large-scale data collection system. Funding is required to build and support the observer network and technical system.

Typically, this funding is obtained from sources such as international donor agencies or non-governmental organizations.Nearly every decision about the structure of a quick count has far reaching resource implications. Speed requires telephones and computers to collect and synthesize information. Accuracy demands more sophisticated systems to process data and complete reports. Comprehensiveness means more volunteers, more training and higher election-day costs.


This manual describes how to organize and conduct a quick count, also known as a parallel vote tabulation (PVT). A quick count is a powerful method for monitoring election day developments. Groups around the world have undertaken quick counts to promote democratic electoral processes and to detect when election results have been manipulated.  The handbook’s primary audience is civic organizations that monitor elections, but the principles and advice presented also apply to election monitoring projects conducted by political parties and international organizations.

During a quick count, observers watch the voting and counting processes at specifically selected polling stations, record key information on standardized forms and report their findings (including the polling station’s vote count) to a central data collection center. Quick count leaders use this information to evaluate the overall quality of election-day processes and to project, or verify, official election results based on precise analysis of polling station data. 

Quick count methodology has become increasingly sophisticated over the last 15 years. A cornerstone of this methodology is its use of the science of statistics. Most quick counts today do not involve collecting information from every polling station; rather, data are gathered from a random statistical sample of polling stations. This allows groups to rapidly assemble and report data that are reliable and accurate within a very small margin of error.

We provides quick count support to its partner organizations based on a joint analysis of the needs of the organization. This may include providing technical experts, training and strategic planning advice. The Institute is particularly interested in helping groups link election observation to other democracy building activities.